Alternate propeller designs

Off topic posts are welcome in this forum!
No smear campaign, or you will be banned!

Moderator: Mike Everman

Post Reply
cudabean
Posts: 80
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2003 4:30 pm

Alternate propeller designs

Post by cudabean » Tue Nov 11, 2003 10:45 pm

All aircraft propellers that I've seen revolve around a drive shaft aligned with the longitudinal axis. Has anyone seen a propeller that operates more-or-less like a sternwheeler paddle? I've seen windmills that revolve around a vertical axis, but I suppose the problem with using that type of design in reverse is that I suppose that if you apply power directly to it, it would sling out the air in all directions at once and provide no net thrust.

cudabean

Mike Everman
Posts: 5007
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 7:25 am
Antipspambot question: 0
Location: santa barbara, CA
Contact:

Post by Mike Everman » Wed Nov 12, 2003 12:03 am

You'd do that with a cyclic pitch change, though as a driver it would be less than stellar in terms of thrust per parasitic pound. Helicopter rotors are very efficient owing to the long aspect ratio, and the axiom: it is more efficient to move alot of air slowly than a little very fast.
-Mike

Bruno Ogorelec
Posts: 3542
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2003 7:31 am
Antipspambot question: 0
Location: Zagreb, Croatia

Post by Bruno Ogorelec » Wed Nov 12, 2003 10:25 am

Mike Everman wrote:it is more efficient to move alot of air slowly than a little very fast.
If I can amend that:

It is more efficient to move a lot of air at about the speed you intend to travel than a little air much faster, even though the total momentum may be the same. This covers the entire spectrum of airspeeds.

Bruno

Mike Everman
Posts: 5007
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 7:25 am
Antipspambot question: 0
Location: santa barbara, CA
Contact:

Post by Mike Everman » Wed Nov 12, 2003 3:32 pm

I sit corrected.

cudabean
Posts: 80
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2003 4:30 pm

Post by cudabean » Wed Nov 12, 2003 6:58 pm

Thanks for the responses. Another problem, besides efficiency, with small area velocity greatly exceeding the flight speed is noise.

One possibility for alternate forms of thrust generation is a squirrel cage blower.

cudabean

Peter Hanely
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2003 4:11 pm
Antipspambot question: 0
Location: Sacramento, Ca, US
Contact:

Post by Peter Hanely » Wed Nov 12, 2003 7:15 pm

I've considered propellers with an axis crosswise to flow.

Advantages:
- thrust can be quickly changed to any direction crosswise to direction.
- for a helicoptor such a blade can avoid retreating tip stall.

Disadvantage:
- each blade must constantly cycle between pulling air in and pushing it out the other side.

Mike Everman
Posts: 5007
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 7:25 am
Antipspambot question: 0
Location: santa barbara, CA
Contact:

Post by Mike Everman » Wed Nov 12, 2003 7:31 pm

Centrifugal forces unfortunately limit how fast you can spin it, putting the blades in bending, and all things being imperfect, some will bend out slightly more than others making for catasrophic imbalance. there's damned little better than a ducted fan, but I search too...
Mike Often wrong, never unsure.
__________________________

Hank
Posts: 539
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2003 4:34 pm
Antipspambot question: 0
Location: Florida, USA

Other than the centerline....

Post by Hank » Thu Nov 13, 2003 10:36 pm

Hello- The only propulsion assembly that popped into my head even near what you mention is one constructed by a fellow-member of a model aircraft club I once belonged to.
Though centerline thrust it is still interesting re this topic.
The assembly consisted of a ducted fan with the blades mounted in a ring.
The tips were close to the centerline. power transmission was through a rubber wheel fed by a flexible shaft from the engine. This unit worked, but stability in flight was near nonexistent due to the torque.

Kudos Mike Kirney for mentioning eBay re sheet metal tools. There is not much out there now. Does anyone know of any manufacturers of small crank operated beading tools?

Hank

nmasters
Posts: 22
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 2:06 pm
Antipspambot question: 0
Location: western Colorado
Contact:

Re: Alternate propeller designs

Post by nmasters » Fri Nov 14, 2003 4:51 am

cudabean wrote:All aircraft propellers that I've seen revolve around a drive shaft aligned with the longitudinal axis. Has anyone seen a propeller that operates more-or-less like a sternwheeler paddle? I've seen windmills that revolve around a vertical axis, but I suppose the problem with using that type of design in reverse is that I suppose that if you apply power directly to it, it would sling out the air in all directions at once and provide no net thrust.

cudabean
It's been tried a few times with limited success. Too many highly stressed moving parts without any gains. Here are some links


The Caldwell "Cyclogyro":
http://www.ufx.org/maryland/caldwell.htm

The "Fanwing":
http://www.fanwing.com/ann_exclusive.htm

Some NACA tech reports of wind tunnel testing of the "Cyclogyro":
http://naca.larc.nasa.gov/reports/1935/naca-tn-528/
http://naca.larc.nasa.gov/reports/1930/naca-tn-467/
.~.
/V\
// \\
/( )\
(^^)-(^^) Norm

nmasters
Posts: 22
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 2:06 pm
Antipspambot question: 0
Location: western Colorado
Contact:

Post by nmasters » Fri Nov 14, 2003 6:13 am

Here's a picture of the Cyclogyro

http://www.aerofiles.com/schroeder.jpg
.~.
/V\
// \\
/( )\
(^^)-(^^) Norm

Mike Everman
Posts: 5007
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 7:25 am
Antipspambot question: 0
Location: santa barbara, CA
Contact:

Post by Mike Everman » Fri Nov 14, 2003 7:04 am

Very nice links, Norm. I enjoyed that a lot. The fan wing reminds me of a shred of an idea I had a long time ago, but replace the fan with a cylinder. No blast down the upper surface with mine, but huge lift from Magnus. Lift unfortunately = drag still.
Mike Often wrong, never unsure.
__________________________

Mike Everman
Posts: 5007
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 7:25 am
Antipspambot question: 0
Location: santa barbara, CA
Contact:

Post by Mike Everman » Fri Nov 14, 2003 5:01 pm

Hey, coincidentally enough, the new Popular Science showed up yesterday with an old PS cover with a paddle-wheel propeller flying boat. I'll scan it and post when I get a minute.
Mike Often wrong, never unsure.
__________________________

Peter Hanely
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2003 4:11 pm
Antipspambot question: 0
Location: Sacramento, Ca, US
Contact:

Post by Peter Hanely » Fri Nov 14, 2003 6:46 pm

nmasters wrote:Here's a picture of the Cyclogyro

http://www.aerofiles.com/schroeder.jpg
Different from the arangement I was thinking of. Mine would feather the airfoils 'above' and 'below' the airstream so as to not stall them, tilting for angle of attack up or down relitive to the circle, and would always keep one edge foreward into the airstream.

Looks like the aircraft pictured places the advancing blade for lift and the retreating blade paddlewheel style, the airfoil spinning about it's pivot on the circle.

nmasters
Posts: 22
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 2:06 pm
Antipspambot question: 0
Location: western Colorado
Contact:

Post by nmasters » Fri Nov 14, 2003 11:00 pm

Mike Everman wrote: The fan wing reminds me of a shred of an idea I had a long time ago, but replace the fan with a cylinder.
That would be a variation on a flettner rotor. There was an experiment to do exactly what you describe with an OV-10 "Bronco". I don't know how it turned out but there is a picture of it on Rex Research's flettner rotor page.

http://www.rexresearch.com/aero/1aero.htm#thompson

That page has got a lot of flettner related images on it and loads really slow so here's the link to the Bronco picture:
http://www.rexresearch.com/aero/magnus1.gif
.~.
/V\
// \\
/( )\
(^^)-(^^) Norm

Mike Everman
Posts: 5007
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 7:25 am
Antipspambot question: 0
Location: santa barbara, CA
Contact:

Post by Mike Everman » Sat Nov 15, 2003 1:21 am

Well, I declare, Norm, another "nothing new under the sun" in living color. Please visit the Valveless section, PJ alternators thread; maybe your considerable archive could save us there...
Thanks, that was a cool one!
Mike Often wrong, never unsure.
__________________________

Post Reply