Remove Bruce Simpsons link from the links page

[Viv]

Kenneth.

Yet another person has posted a message concerning non delivery of goods ordered from Bruce Simpson!

Enough is enough, we have had a constant stream of his victims visiting this forum over the last few years detailing there problems dealing with none delivery of goods ordered from him.

This web site is promoting Bruce Simpson and his business by having a link to him on the links page.

So I ask for his link to be removed on the grounds that he is ripping off his customers and our forums members, this forum should not support him by continuing to host a link to his web site and business.

Viv

[luc]

Deleted in the interests of a peacefull life

Luc

[Viv]

Deleted in the interests of a peacefull life

Viv

[Rossco]

Viv, Luc, ummmmm.

Go easy...

I really dont want to get into this battle personaly, but i moreso dont want to see unnesssasary harm done.

A very small amount of such a subject was touched on by influential, and directly concerned people in person, and even though no conclusions were made, officialy or not, a certain understanding was unspokenly reached.

I myself am in dept of that cirtain site. And i have observed independently, but directly, that many others are as well.

I really think that there should be made clear, a destinction between the two, or even more, separate identities!
The site, which includes the content, and separately the claims, propaganda and sales sceim.
Then there is the original mind, the man and some distortion over time of the dealings and/or merges with other influences. Separation of purpose, and personal gain.

I really dont think that there is a single person that can say exactly what went on entirely, or what situation remains that is causing such grief!
But i do think that care should be taken not to spread the disruption and malace to compleatly separate parties that are in no way involved in the off side of the deal.

I feel that i need some sort of disclaimer here, along the lines of;
"we", [the sole opinionised, or un-united colection] "do not in any way indorse the activities of, or dealings with, the above mentioned" [directly mentioned or implied] "orginisation or individual." "Although due respect for prior invention, work and communication must be given."

Rossco

Luc, Viv, youve got a vandeta, and its with reason. Just please be cautious of where you thrash it about.
I have the utmost respect and admiration of you, and wish no ill feelings to remain from my possibly hasty responce. Thanx.

[Viv]

Deleted in the interests of a peacefull life

Viv

[Jmitchell]

PUTAIN!

[Rossco]

Yes, i suppose that i am making four points, and to summise all, would indeed make five!

Saying that though, i am really not trying to make any definite point but express my oppinion that there is more to all this than just a con artist that has only been there all along to rip everyone off! Although that shouldnt be ignored, we (the majority here) dont have the real need to actively pursue any resolution to this problem, that is not effecting us directly as it might you.

I knew i shouldnt have got into this!
Ha, im not clarifying anything am i?

Sorry, i just felt i needed to have a ramble on a very confusing subject, and in doing so probably did not help anything.

Yours was obviously a faily hard hit tho, that hinted on an attack, and it has cirtanly got a reaction.

Rossco

[resosys]

This is no place to launch a personal attack with silly threats.

This issue needs to be resolved between the parties involved. Doing it here, in this way, will only damage your reputation and public image.

You (Luc and Viv) have made immense contributions to this forum and community and it pains me to see that it has come to this.

I hope things get resolved quickly and that all parties can move on.


Chris

[Viv]

Deleted in the interests of a peacefull life

Viv

[Viv]

Deleted in the interests of a peacefull life

Viv

[luc]

Deleted in the interests of a peacefull life

Luc

[Mike Everman]

God. Re-effing-lax, man. I talked to Kenneth at the meet and he was apologetic and has meant no ill will. He's just lumped that link together with his desire to upgrade the entire site.

You're a business man now, Luc. It's perfectly reasonable to say, "I'll give you $100 when you put up my link", and in hindsight that's how you should have.

You'll get what you want eventually, if you're not too pissy and fling around conspiracy theories at Kenneth, IMHO.

[Tom]

Thread Locked to avoid a flame war. Take it offline Chaps/

Tom

[Tom]

Sorry Tom, but no problem has ever been solved by stopping talking about it. The discussion is here, the resolution should be here. I haven't written a letter to someone in ages, so taking it offline would entail me flying to Canada to talk in person. And it seems odd that your first activity in a month is to lock a thread.

Actually I've been doing general Mod stuff, Fixing errors in formatting tags and hyperlinks, Small things yet they need doing. 'Tis not my first action this month. However. I would at least say this be moved to the Off Topic, I think that what could escalate into a Flame War woulc be detrimental to the health and apperance of the community.

Tom

[Viv]

The subject is closed!

Viv and Luc