My new Engine

Moderator: Mike Everman

metiz
Posts: 1575
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 6:34 pm
Antipspambot question: 125
Location: Netherlands

Re: My new Engine

Post by metiz » Thu May 17, 2012 4:24 pm

Based soley on other designs with those features: the divergant cone is waaay too long
Quantify the world.

ganuganu
Posts: 346
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 7:31 am
Antipspambot question: 125
Location: india
Contact:

Re: My new Engine

Post by ganuganu » Fri May 18, 2012 12:36 pm

"divergent cone" are you referring it to first or second cone in exhaust pipe. This is the first time iam designing these type of engines so i need some experience in developing it. Are you saying me to reduce the length.

metiz
Posts: 1575
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 6:34 pm
Antipspambot question: 125
Location: Netherlands

Re: My new Engine

Post by metiz » Fri May 18, 2012 11:10 pm

The divergant cone is the first, long one. Yes, decrease its length by 60% or so
Quantify the world.

ganuganu
Posts: 346
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 7:31 am
Antipspambot question: 125
Location: india
Contact:

Re: My new Engine

Post by ganuganu » Sat May 19, 2012 8:05 am

here is the modified design take a look at the picture.
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/703/twochoke1.png/

metiz
Posts: 1575
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 6:34 pm
Antipspambot question: 125
Location: Netherlands

Re: My new Engine

Post by metiz » Sat May 19, 2012 9:25 am

That's more like it. I'd say decrease the reflector (2nd cone) to 55mm and build it. If you want a good benchmark you should also build an identical engine with just a straight pipe and compare thrust and fuel consumption.
Quantify the world.

ganuganu
Posts: 346
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 7:31 am
Antipspambot question: 125
Location: india
Contact:

Re: My new Engine

Post by ganuganu » Sat May 19, 2012 1:11 pm

Here is the modified cad design. Is there any particular reason for reducing the rectifier length.
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/98/twochoke2.png/

metiz
Posts: 1575
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 6:34 pm
Antipspambot question: 125
Location: Netherlands

Re: My new Engine

Post by metiz » Sun May 20, 2012 2:05 pm

All my comments are based soley on what I've seen in other engines that have those parts and none of them had rectifieres nearly as long.
Quantify the world.

ganuganu
Posts: 346
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 7:31 am
Antipspambot question: 125
Location: india
Contact:

Re: My new Engine

Post by ganuganu » Thu May 24, 2012 12:37 pm

Hello joe and metiz here is a video i have got for you. This is my previous engine which i didnt start after adding augmenter, now it works like monster :evil: still thrust not tested. Just made to work it at low throttle. All people came out of their house and searching for the sound :lol: :lol: it was really ground shaking.

http://youtu.be/ERl1PzsIBhM

ganuganu
Posts: 346
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 7:31 am
Antipspambot question: 125
Location: india
Contact:

Re: My new Engine

Post by ganuganu » Thu May 31, 2012 12:56 pm

Hello guys here is the small development made my previous design engine. Going to run it on 7th because till 6th i have got my theory exams.
Attachments
a.jpg

Mike Everman
Posts: 5007
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 7:25 am
Antipspambot question: 0
Location: santa barbara, CA
Contact:

Re: My new Engine

Post by Mike Everman » Thu May 31, 2012 2:47 pm

Love the video, looks great!
Mike Often wrong, never unsure.
__________________________

ganuganu
Posts: 346
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 7:31 am
Antipspambot question: 125
Location: india
Contact:

Re: My new Engine

Post by ganuganu » Fri Jun 01, 2012 3:02 pm

Mike Everman wrote:Love the video, looks great!
Thank you mike. :D

ganuganu
Posts: 346
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 7:31 am
Antipspambot question: 125
Location: india
Contact:

Re: My new Engine

Post by ganuganu » Fri Jun 08, 2012 12:00 pm

Yaaaay, engine ran successfully!!!!!! It started in first attempt itself. But unfortunately i kept my mobile in my room so wasnt able to take the video. I will post the video tomorrow. Got some pictures for you all.
Attachments
08062012858.jpg
08062012857.jpg

ganuganu
Posts: 346
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 7:31 am
Antipspambot question: 125
Location: india
Contact:

Re: My new Engine

Post by ganuganu » Sat Jun 09, 2012 10:14 am

Here is the video of my new engine. :D :D :D runs and screams awesome.

http://youtu.be/3klPH3crq1M

metiz
Posts: 1575
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 6:34 pm
Antipspambot question: 125
Location: Netherlands

Re: My new Engine

Post by metiz » Sat Jun 09, 2012 4:59 pm

Looking good! Now make a 2nd identical engine with just a straight pipe and see if there's a thrust difference
Quantify the world.

ganuganu
Posts: 346
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 7:31 am
Antipspambot question: 125
Location: india
Contact:

Re: My new Engine

Post by ganuganu » Sun Jun 10, 2012 6:57 am

metiz wrote:Looking good! Now make a 2nd identical engine with just a straight pipe and see if there's a thrust difference
Already my first attempt was with straight pipe still i didnt calculate the thrust difference but by seeing i can say that the cone transition design is much powerful than the straight pipe design.
Attachments
a.jpg
25052012829.jpg

Post Reply