Blended bodies
Moderator: Mike Everman
Re: Blended bodies
Here is a second look at "blending" for clarity.
Just basically an addition of the areas of CC and tail.
Note that the cone angle increases. From my experience I would say to keep the blended cone angle near 20 degrees overall, or if exceeded a gradual radius will need to be applied (marked in red).
Just basically an addition of the areas of CC and tail.
Note that the cone angle increases. From my experience I would say to keep the blended cone angle near 20 degrees overall, or if exceeded a gradual radius will need to be applied (marked in red).
Re: Blended bodies
Ah HA! ok so basically you make an engine twice as fat (in 2d caliber perspective) but keep the length the same...
Would this work with any well designed engine? If you were to try this with, say, Eric's 3 pound thermo, would that work?
how about an engine like my M40?
Would this work with any well designed engine? If you were to try this with, say, Eric's 3 pound thermo, would that work?
how about an engine like my M40?
Quantify the world.
Re: Blended bodies
Yes make them fat....ha
Keep the intake characteristics in place.
Some engines are already blended to some extent. I can't say for sure what will or won't work outside the types I meddle with.
Keep the intake characteristics in place.
Some engines are already blended to some extent. I can't say for sure what will or won't work outside the types I meddle with.
Last edited by PyroJoe on Tue May 24, 2011 4:25 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Blended bodies
let me dust off my M40 plans and see how it looks in sketchup
Quantify the world.
Re: Blended bodies
It looks like this...
I don't know. It looks way off BUT! this is a LARGE engine, probably fatter than the Dreadnought, and I know engine geometry takes a turn towards the twilight zone when they get realy big so...any thoughts? If anything I'd like the rectifier a bit longer, but that's thinking in smaller engine ways again.
I've left out the intakes because I'm not sure about that part. Should I just redesign them for this engine?
I don't know. It looks way off BUT! this is a LARGE engine, probably fatter than the Dreadnought, and I know engine geometry takes a turn towards the twilight zone when they get realy big so...any thoughts? If anything I'd like the rectifier a bit longer, but that's thinking in smaller engine ways again.
I've left out the intakes because I'm not sure about that part. Should I just redesign them for this engine?
Quantify the world.
Re: Blended bodies
Is that by diameter, or area?
Re: Blended bodies
I don't understand. It's not because I'm stupid, but because of the language barrier, you see.PyroJoe wrote:Is that by diameter, or area?
Quantify the world.
Re: Blended bodies
Here is the 20 degrees on the cone section I was refering to. It may not be the same for your type of engine, but on mine will typically have trouble when 20 degrees is exceeded. I have one that failed to run at 26, and another that failed at 23. Both where small, and didn't have a radius. This becomes more of a problem for blended engines, as the angle tends to increase.
Re: Blended bodies
Ah, silly me. I'm adding diameters. my cone angle is 40 degrees, however, the cone angle on the M40 is 43 degrees
Quantify the world.
Re: Blended bodies
yeah, it doesn't appear to be as big a problem with large engines to have a wide angle.
Re: Blended bodies
It needs to be added by areas.