Question?

Moderator: Mike Everman

Post Reply
Chadly33
Posts: 205
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 4:51 am
Antipspambot question: 0
Location: Australia
Contact:

Question?

Post by Chadly33 » Wed Oct 15, 2008 9:58 am

Wouldnt the heat output of a valveless be better used to add to the thrust, by using the engine as a superheater for a steam rocket ? Could you simply encase the CC allowing a nozzle to be formed around the exhaust pipe and spray in water between the two cases with a one way valve on the feed line? Causing steam to be let out at high pressure aka steam rocket ? :?
Bribie Islands resident mad scientist!http://www.geocities.com/ozpulse@y7mail ... 5835711956

Sebastian LFT
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 5:50 pm

Re: Question?

Post by Sebastian LFT » Wed Oct 15, 2008 12:47 pm

That's an awesome idea !!. Sounds like you got another project a brew'n :evil:
You'll never know 'till you try it.

Mike Everman
Posts: 5007
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 7:25 am
Antipspambot question: 0
Location: santa barbara, CA
Contact:

Re: Question?

Post by Mike Everman » Thu Oct 16, 2008 12:00 am

I've been there a bit. Conclusion is that your tailpipe will crush if done that way. Better to make a center body with your nozzle in the middle, and the exhaust pipe outside and therefore annular. I made one like that and took it to Graham and Nick's test site but couldn't get it started. (It didn't have the steam nozzle yet, just wanted to get the motor to go, and I'd finished it the night before going to the UK.) ;-)
Attachments
steamboy.jpg
Mike Often wrong, never unsure.
__________________________

marksteamnz
Posts: 408
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 1:42 am
Antipspambot question: 0
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Question?

Post by marksteamnz » Thu Oct 16, 2008 7:01 am

You have to get the water in ( a lot of water) at a pressure higher than it is going to come out if you are looking at feeding a jet on a continuous basis. Or you need a strong vented container to fill with water and then seal. Heat in = minutes, Thrust = seconds. Mass flow vs heat transfer is a bear.
Chadly33 wrote:Wouldnt the heat output of a valveless be better used to add to the thrust, by using the engine as a superheater for a steam rocket ? Could you simply encase the CC allowing a nozzle to be formed around the exhaust pipe and spray in water between the two cases with a one way valve on the feed line? Causing steam to be let out at high pressure aka steam rocket ? :?
Cheers
Mark Stacey
www.cncprototyping.co.nz

Chadly33
Posts: 205
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 4:51 am
Antipspambot question: 0
Location: Australia
Contact:

Re: Question?

Post by Chadly33 » Thu Oct 16, 2008 8:17 am

I thought more along the lines of the water pumped in a larger volume giving a slight moment before it superheats expanding enough to shut off the oneway feed valve exiting the nozzle creating a vacume inside the expansion chamber for the next load of water to dump in? I thought it would run more like a pulse engine using steam as fuel and the inlet (oneway valve) as the equivilent of a valved engine. Of course the area for expansion (The outer CC body) Would have to be tuned to the amount of water dumped in as well as the nozzle size! Ive got plenty of oneway valves good for 1500 psi. :?
Bribie Islands resident mad scientist!http://www.geocities.com/ozpulse@y7mail ... 5835711956

Vermin
Posts: 281
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 11:16 am
Antipspambot question: 0
Location: Ontario Canada

Re: Question?

Post by Vermin » Thu Oct 16, 2008 9:22 am

The dificulty with using water in its natural state is that it contains dissolved minerals, any enclosed chamber would have to be cleaned of the built up residule scale, unless of course you were to use deionized or distilled water, it would probably be best to inject directly into the cc where the scale can be ejected with the exhaust. Steam propulsion is viable, but If i remember correctly the process utilizes hydrogen peroxide and a silver catalist, the concentration of peroxide is very very nasty stuff to play with.
V
Vern
A desire to destroy as many man made hydrocarbon compounds as possible in one lifetime.

Graham C. Williams
Posts: 571
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2003 11:33 pm
Antipspambot question: 0
Location: England
Contact:

Re: Question?

Post by Graham C. Williams » Thu Oct 16, 2008 10:05 am

Mr Jim Bamford (http://www.onthewire.co.uk/bamford.htm) developed a boiler for his flash steam hydroplane.
From the Book Experimental Flash Steam, J.H. Benson and A.A. Raymond. Tee Publishing.
I Quote "The 'Bamford' venturi-type boiler is undoubtedly the most efficient steam generator yet devised for model hydroplane work.' 'It is really a blowlamp and boiler combined, and all air necessary for combustion passes through the venture. Forward motion of the boat assists the natural injector effect. In Frank Jutton's version of this boiler combustion improves considerably as the boat builds up speed."
I'm sure you can see where this is going---"The boiler was efficient but made an extraordinary booming noise which could be heard over a considerable distance. It was thought that this phenomenon was due to the venturi and boiler acting as a kind of pulsejet.""
As to steam Pressure: "About 2000 psi was the normal working pressure on an experimental turbine plant." " Jim Bamford has recorded over 4000 psi in a model steam plant"

As a young man I saw a hydroplane with this boiler run; not the original, that was before my time but a copy . From our point of view Jim had made a boiler that utilised the properties of non-steady combustion.

Graham.
Dark days nurture new
light. Productions begin.
Now open your eyes.

Ghrey
Posts: 286
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 8:41 am
Antipspambot question: 125
Location: Studio City, California
Contact:

Re: Question?

Post by Ghrey » Sat Oct 18, 2008 8:42 am

I have thought about this idea lately as well, ( last 6 mos ), but have not done any thing in the way of design or testing. No space or time.

I will follow your inquiries with interest.
In the process of moving, from the glorified phone booth we had to the house we have.

No real time to work on jets, more space, no time.

Life still complicated.

Post Reply