UFlow progress
Moderator: Mike Everman
-
- Posts: 4939
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 7:25 am
- Antipspambot question: 0
- Location: santa barbara, CA
- Contact:
re: UFlow progress
Great, Sam.
Pre and post processing with excel would be a neat solution for me; a step closer to automated iteration. Does your code animate the results?
RE: 2d: I thought that would be key to separation and depiction of vortices?
Pre and post processing with excel would be a neat solution for me; a step closer to automated iteration. Does your code animate the results?
RE: 2d: I thought that would be key to separation and depiction of vortices?
Mike
__________________________
Follow my technical science blog at: http://mikeeverman.com/
Get alerts for the above on twitter at: http://twitter.com/mikeeverman
__________________________
Follow my technical science blog at: http://mikeeverman.com/
Get alerts for the above on twitter at: http://twitter.com/mikeeverman
-
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2004 5:40 pm
- Antipspambot question: 0
- Location: Stoke-on-Trent, England
re: UFlow progress
Mike,
The results aren't animated. It wouldn't be too hard to write a script that would do it from MATLAB though. I'm sure you'll think of some way of viewing the results.
You're right of course - 2 dimensions are absolutely necessary to model any vortical motion. However, 1D wave mechanics captures the dominant fluid motion in the inlet and tailpipe very adequately. If you wanna model combustion properly you need a full 3D viscous solution (= very very slow).
The results aren't animated. It wouldn't be too hard to write a script that would do it from MATLAB though. I'm sure you'll think of some way of viewing the results.
You're right of course - 2 dimensions are absolutely necessary to model any vortical motion. However, 1D wave mechanics captures the dominant fluid motion in the inlet and tailpipe very adequately. If you wanna model combustion properly you need a full 3D viscous solution (= very very slow).
-
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2004 5:40 pm
- Antipspambot question: 0
- Location: Stoke-on-Trent, England
re: UFlow progress
Mike and Ben,
Software attached. Just unzip it into any directory. I've also thrown together some instructions. It may take you a while to get used to it but its fairly straight foward once you get used to it. In general it outputs a lot more information than UFLOW does, so file sizes can get quite large if you're not careful.
Let me know how you get on. I'm sure you'll have a million questions!
Sam
Software attached. Just unzip it into any directory. I've also thrown together some instructions. It may take you a while to get used to it but its fairly straight foward once you get used to it. In general it outputs a lot more information than UFLOW does, so file sizes can get quite large if you're not careful.
Let me know how you get on. I'm sure you'll have a million questions!
Sam
- Attachments
-
- code.zip
- (35.52 KiB) Downloaded 199 times
-
- Posts: 4939
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 7:25 am
- Antipspambot question: 0
- Location: santa barbara, CA
- Contact:
re: UFlow progress
Cool. Still reviewing it.
Here's some of the waveforms plotted. For those following along, each hump is the pressure wave at a different point in time. I think I can make a slider in Excel so you can drag it to animate like in UFLOW. I'll give it a shot.
Here's some of the waveforms plotted. For those following along, each hump is the pressure wave at a different point in time. I think I can make a slider in Excel so you can drag it to animate like in UFLOW. I'll give it a shot.
- Attachments
-
- sams output.JPG (23.48 KiB) Viewed 4706 times
Mike
__________________________
Follow my technical science blog at: http://mikeeverman.com/
Get alerts for the above on twitter at: http://twitter.com/mikeeverman
__________________________
Follow my technical science blog at: http://mikeeverman.com/
Get alerts for the above on twitter at: http://twitter.com/mikeeverman
-
- Posts: 4939
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 7:25 am
- Antipspambot question: 0
- Location: santa barbara, CA
- Contact:
re: UFlow progress
Sam and Ben,
Attached is a first cut of animating the output in excel. Works great after importing p.dat. I'll tweak it a bit so you can select p,t,v, etc. It'll be a learning experience to be sure, doing the macros to automate the importing and chart scaling, but this works. It's fun to watch. I enjoyed figuring this out while staying home with a flu ridden 7 year old. ;-)
Attached is a first cut of animating the output in excel. Works great after importing p.dat. I'll tweak it a bit so you can select p,t,v, etc. It'll be a learning experience to be sure, doing the macros to automate the importing and chart scaling, but this works. It's fun to watch. I enjoyed figuring this out while staying home with a flu ridden 7 year old. ;-)
- Attachments
-
- nudis post processor demo.xls
- (210 KiB) Downloaded 245 times
Mike
__________________________
Follow my technical science blog at: http://mikeeverman.com/
Get alerts for the above on twitter at: http://twitter.com/mikeeverman
__________________________
Follow my technical science blog at: http://mikeeverman.com/
Get alerts for the above on twitter at: http://twitter.com/mikeeverman
-
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2004 5:40 pm
- Antipspambot question: 0
- Location: Stoke-on-Trent, England
re: UFlow progress
I'm really impressed with your animation tool Mike. Didn't realise you could do that in Excel. You can increase the temporal resolution in inputs.dat. On line 2 change 50 to 5 and you'll get 10 times as much output, but covering the same time interval.
You'll notice that the wave decreases in strength over time. This is partly because of friction and heat transfer, but mainly because the boundary conditions are not perfectly reflective as they were in UFLOW. This is physically more correct and simulates jetting during outflow and sink flow during inflow.
Have you worked out how to change the geometry yet?
Sam
You'll notice that the wave decreases in strength over time. This is partly because of friction and heat transfer, but mainly because the boundary conditions are not perfectly reflective as they were in UFLOW. This is physically more correct and simulates jetting during outflow and sink flow during inflow.
Have you worked out how to change the geometry yet?
Sam
-
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2004 5:40 pm
- Antipspambot question: 0
- Location: Stoke-on-Trent, England
re: UFlow progress
One of the great things about MATLAB though (and presumably SCILAB too) is that you can plot all the data at once.
For example the attached plot shows the pressure. The horizontal axis is cell number and the vertical axis is time. The magnitude of the pressure is interpreted as a colour. Red is positive, Blue is negative. You can see the compression waves move outwards from the centre and reflect from the open ends as blue expansion waves. The lines are staright which indicates that the waves move at constant velocity. This is because the speed of sound is constant (because the temperature is constant)
Sam
For example the attached plot shows the pressure. The horizontal axis is cell number and the vertical axis is time. The magnitude of the pressure is interpreted as a colour. Red is positive, Blue is negative. You can see the compression waves move outwards from the centre and reflect from the open ends as blue expansion waves. The lines are staright which indicates that the waves move at constant velocity. This is because the speed of sound is constant (because the temperature is constant)
Sam
- Attachments
-
- p.jpg
- (65.9 KiB) Downloaded 243 times
-
- Posts: 4939
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 7:25 am
- Antipspambot question: 0
- Location: santa barbara, CA
- Contact:
re: UFlow progress
There's some methods of plotting all the data, I haven't explored them all. Here's one possible representation.
- Attachments
-
- cool plot.JPG
- (92.21 KiB) Downloaded 246 times
Mike
__________________________
Follow my technical science blog at: http://mikeeverman.com/
Get alerts for the above on twitter at: http://twitter.com/mikeeverman
__________________________
Follow my technical science blog at: http://mikeeverman.com/
Get alerts for the above on twitter at: http://twitter.com/mikeeverman
-
- Posts: 4939
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 7:25 am
- Antipspambot question: 0
- Location: santa barbara, CA
- Contact:
Re: re: UFlow progress
Geometry input should be easy, you'll see a graphic representation as you build it.. I started with the semi hard part. I need to learn more about VB to make it really good, but I'll get it to limp along in the wee hours tonight. ;0)sam wrote: Have you worked out how to change the geometry yet?
Sam
Mike
__________________________
Follow my technical science blog at: http://mikeeverman.com/
Get alerts for the above on twitter at: http://twitter.com/mikeeverman
__________________________
Follow my technical science blog at: http://mikeeverman.com/
Get alerts for the above on twitter at: http://twitter.com/mikeeverman
-
- Posts: 4939
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 7:25 am
- Antipspambot question: 0
- Location: santa barbara, CA
- Contact:
re: UFlow progress
Here is the state of the post processor. Geometry entry sheet is next. I've got the pressure, velocity and temperature plots animating off of the slider at right.
- Attachments
-
- nudis post processor demo.xls
- (1.39 MiB) Downloaded 256 times
Mike
__________________________
Follow my technical science blog at: http://mikeeverman.com/
Get alerts for the above on twitter at: http://twitter.com/mikeeverman
__________________________
Follow my technical science blog at: http://mikeeverman.com/
Get alerts for the above on twitter at: http://twitter.com/mikeeverman
re: UFlow progress
Amazing, amazing, guys!
Luckily I recived an email copy earlier while I did not know I would drive home this weekend.
I'll see whether I can effort some time donation to the most useful stuff provided since, well, quite some time here.
Luckily I recived an email copy earlier while I did not know I would drive home this weekend.
I'll see whether I can effort some time donation to the most useful stuff provided since, well, quite some time here.
mk
-
- Posts: 4140
- Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 1:17 am
- Antipspambot question: 0
- Location: Mingo, Iowa USA
- Contact:
Re: re: UFlow progress
I just completed revising my "animated" FWE density applet, dividing the tailpipe up into twice as many slices as before (each slice now less than an inch long). This required eight new data files from the worksheet.hinote wrote:Also stated again--UFlow is capable of a lot more than many are giving it credit for.
Guess what - now, you can actually see the little red hot zone that's about three inches in from the tailpipe flare! I swear I am not making this up. Amazingly, this narrow zone stays at a higher density than the gas around it for two separate, fairly lengthy segments of the cycle, which I suppose allows a lot of conduction to the pipe in that zone.
Another interesting detail that would have been "predicted" by UFLOW1D - the extreme concentration of heat in the chamber. I believe the evidence for this shows in all the pictures I posted earlier - the low density (i.e. superheated) gas in the chamber remains practically undisturbed throughout the entire cycle. This is verifiable by looking at the UFLOW Mach numbers and mass flows throughout the chamber zone - all very low values at almost every time point. In the FWE, the chamber is nothing but a static pump that applies pressure to the outer parts of the engine. (But, maybe this is just as true for every other pulsejet.)
L Cottrill
-
- Posts: 413
- Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 9:01 pm
- Antipspambot question: 0
- Location: Simi Valley CA
re: UFlow progress
Hi Larry,
Nice to hear about UFLOW progress.
It would be great if you could upload a UFLOW file for us. I'm still having trouble trying to determine the best settings.
Thanks very much,
Nice to hear about UFLOW progress.
It would be great if you could upload a UFLOW file for us. I'm still having trouble trying to determine the best settings.
Thanks very much,
Hagen Tannberg
re: UFlow progress
Excellent stuff Larry,
I think I'll be looking for a copy RSN.
I think you have confirmed my view of an old argument, several years back.
People used to talk a log about hot slugs of gas moving throught the engine, and I would argue that it is really a pressure wave moving through the gas.
The pressure wave will move at the speed of the gas flow, plus the speed of sound in the gas (which unfortunately varies all over the place, making "rule of thumb" design very difficult, and making UFLOW a godsend.
The gas does move a bit each cycle, but only, say, a tenth of the length of the engine? this determines how much fresh intake charge we can get each cycle. If the gas flow is too low, then it doesn't breathe well enough, and will give low thrust.
A good analogy of wave motion through a medium that I remeber from my school days is this:
Put a wrinkle/loop in one end of a rug.
Then push that loop all the way to the other end of the rug.
The loop will have travelled the length of the rug, and the rug will have travelled the "length" of the loop.
The loop is a good analogy for the pressure pulse in the "flying carpet" jet engine.
Have another look at my UFLOW training model I posted a while back.
(I'll bring it to the front again)
This model was concerned solely with getting significant mass flow so as to get a good intake - more power. It keeps the pulse patterns as simple as possible for clarity.
The rest of the engine design is just a straight tube.
Don
I think I'll be looking for a copy RSN.
I think you have confirmed my view of an old argument, several years back.
People used to talk a log about hot slugs of gas moving throught the engine, and I would argue that it is really a pressure wave moving through the gas.
The pressure wave will move at the speed of the gas flow, plus the speed of sound in the gas (which unfortunately varies all over the place, making "rule of thumb" design very difficult, and making UFLOW a godsend.
The gas does move a bit each cycle, but only, say, a tenth of the length of the engine? this determines how much fresh intake charge we can get each cycle. If the gas flow is too low, then it doesn't breathe well enough, and will give low thrust.
A good analogy of wave motion through a medium that I remeber from my school days is this:
Put a wrinkle/loop in one end of a rug.
Then push that loop all the way to the other end of the rug.
The loop will have travelled the length of the rug, and the rug will have travelled the "length" of the loop.
The loop is a good analogy for the pressure pulse in the "flying carpet" jet engine.
Have another look at my UFLOW training model I posted a while back.
(I'll bring it to the front again)
This model was concerned solely with getting significant mass flow so as to get a good intake - more power. It keeps the pulse patterns as simple as possible for clarity.
The rest of the engine design is just a straight tube.
Don