… solution by reading from a scale

Moderator: Mike Everman

WebPilot
Posts: 3716
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Antipspambot question: 0
Location: 41d 1' N 80d 22' W

Re: … solution by reading from a scale

Post by WebPilot » Sun Jan 31, 2010 5:40 pm

 More practice.

Question #2: What is the estimated exhaust diameter for a 100 lbf pulse-jet? Determine the exhaust area.
Image

Kool
Posts: 115
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 7:39 pm
Antipspambot question: 125
Location: The Netherlands

Re: … solution by reading from a scale

Post by Kool » Sun Jan 31, 2010 10:49 pm

More practice.

Question #2: What is the estimated exhaust diameter for a 100 lbf pulse-jet? Determine the exhaust area.
I've enlarged the picture with Paint, so it's not very accurate :mrgreen:

I drew the line from the origin to the 100 lbs value. The inside ring gives exhaust diameter, and readed from my enlarged drawing, gives that an exhaust diameter of 5.7 inch. Checked this with square the 5.7 value I become the D² value: 32.49. From that side I've looked to the the inner scale of the outer ring, and that gives also the 100 lbs thrust value.

In the pulsejet calculator I get 5.64 inch, and I think with an better picture of the scale 'device' that it more matches.

exhaust area: π x r²
I'm not very common with inches, so I have also added a metric value. In inches this is. (0.5 x 5.7)² x π= 25.5 inch²(??)
5.7 inch = 144.78mm. (0.5 x 144.78)² x π= 16462.926mm² = 16.5 cm²
...It's better to generate heat efficiently, than recover it efficiently...

WebPilot
Posts: 3716
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Antipspambot question: 0
Location: 41d 1' N 80d 22' W

Re: … solution by reading from a scale

Post by WebPilot » Mon Feb 01, 2010 12:48 am

 Paint?

 Very good, Poech. As a check, I submit the following.

 This is a partial pic of my chart's Rev B and the inner ring now has an additional scale: the inner is now De and the outer scale is Ae or the exhaust area.

Image

 Having drawn a red line from the center to 100 lbf, one can read on the inner ring: De = 5.69 in and Ae = 25.4 in². 

 Using a calculator (no need to with Rev B), Ae = π/4 × (5.69 in)² = 25.43 in²

 Thus, I can read quite easily and accurately from this circular chart and agree with what you posted.
Image

WebPilot
Posts: 3716
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Antipspambot question: 0
Location: 41d 1' N 80d 22' W

Re: … solution by reading from a scale

Post by WebPilot » Mon Feb 01, 2010 7:24 am

 Point taken, Poech, concerning mm to/from inch conversions. I can use the program, units, on my machine to often times do the conversion for me.

Code: Select all

$ units
2445 units, 71 prefixes, 33 nonlinear units

You have: 5.7 in
You want: mm
	* 144.78
	/ 0.0069070314
You have: 25.5 in in
You want: cm cm
	* 164.5158
	/ 0.0060784435
You have: 
 I am working on another chart to do just this conversion of units. Maybe someday I'll add a ring to the thrust/diameter chart to incorporate both systems of units.
Image

WebPilot
Posts: 3716
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Antipspambot question: 0
Location: 41d 1' N 80d 22' W

Re: … solution by reading from a scale

Post by WebPilot » Mon Feb 01, 2010 4:33 pm

 Yesterday, I was able to do this chart. It converts from in to mm und vice versa.

  Image (c.t.)
Image

WebPilot
Posts: 3716
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Antipspambot question: 0
Location: 41d 1' N 80d 22' W

Re: … solution by reading from a scale

Post by WebPilot » Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:32 am

 I like this scale. I don't use the MKS system too much, and it's nice to have a feel immediately of what size or scale the problem at hand is. With this scale you can quickly do that without a calculator and not get all caught up in pressing the keys in the wrong order or even worse the wrong key and having to start over again.

Well, you might ask yourself, "what good is a conversion scale if it only goes to 10 mm?" It's plenty enough and here's why.

 Let's convert 0.1 mm to inches
  • at the bottom right of the scale, locate 0 and 0.5 and the remaining 4 somewhat large tic marks each respectively denoting 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 . Put your mouse cursor on 0.1 and read the inch scale as 0.004. Why? The midway point to 0.01 is 0.005 and each division is 0.001.
Image

WebPilot
Posts: 3716
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Antipspambot question: 0
Location: 41d 1' N 80d 22' W

Re: … solution by reading from a scale

Post by WebPilot » Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:06 pm

  • Now move up the scale just a 'tad' and find 1 on the mm scale. Looking to the left, read 0.0395 . If you divide both by 10 (or move decimal to the left by one position), we have another, even more accurate estimate for 0.1. Namely, 0.00395 !

    That's 0.00005 less than the above reading.
Image

WebPilot
Posts: 3716
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Antipspambot question: 0
Location: 41d 1' N 80d 22' W

Re: … solution by reading from a scale

Post by WebPilot » Tue Feb 02, 2010 6:33 pm

  • Now continue moving up the scale and locate 10 on the mm scale. On the left scale, read 0.393 plus ¾ of a division, which is .75 × .001 = .00075 . Combining these together, all done in your head, one obtains 0.39375 in for 10 mm.

    If you divide both by 100 (or move the decimal point to the left by two positions), we have another, even more accurate estimate for 0.1 mm. Namely, 0.0039375 in !

    If one multiplies both by 100 (or move the decimal point to the right by two positions), we have the estimate 39.375 in = 1000 mm = 100 cm = 1 m.

    All done with a conversion scale from only 0 to 10.0 mm .
Image

WebPilot
Posts: 3716
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Antipspambot question: 0
Location: 41d 1' N 80d 22' W

Re: … solution by reading from a scale

Post by WebPilot » Wed Feb 03, 2010 1:04 am

  • With practice, the rest of the scale can easily be read to 3 digit accuracy, which is plenty for most engineering computations.
Image

WebPilot
Posts: 3716
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Antipspambot question: 0
Location: 41d 1' N 80d 22' W

Re: … solution by reading from a scale

Post by WebPilot » Thu Feb 04, 2010 3:59 am

Image (c.t.)
  Rev-B
Image

WebPilot
Posts: 3716
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Antipspambot question: 0
Location: 41d 1' N 80d 22' W

Re: … solution by reading from a scale

Post by WebPilot » Fri Feb 05, 2010 5:10 am

... more to come.
Image

WebPilot
Posts: 3716
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Antipspambot question: 0
Location: 41d 1' N 80d 22' W

Re: … solution by reading from a scale

Post by WebPilot » Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:46 am

 Feb 05? Seems like I'm overdue for a new 'rule.
Image

Post Reply