Atom Jet with applied EVG

Moderator: Mike Everman

PyroJoe
Posts: 1743
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 5:44 pm
Antipspambot question: 125
Location: Texas

Re: Atom Jet with applied EVG

Post by PyroJoe » Fri Jan 29, 2010 5:29 pm

Forrest,
Should I use these new values to setup the test?
Thanks, Joe

woody500
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 9:10 pm
Antipspambot question: 125

Re: Atom Jet with applied EVG

Post by woody500 » Fri Jan 29, 2010 6:57 pm

I was going to ask the same question, I will go ahead and use the new values. Phil.

WebPilot
Posts: 3716
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Antipspambot question: 0
Location: 41d 1' N 80d 22' W

Re: Atom Jet with applied EVG

Post by WebPilot » Fri Jan 29, 2010 8:22 pm

Joe and Phil,

 I would make only one petal, perhaps even with fillets, and make the mount (fake retainer) rectangular and adjustable. As the mount shortens the petal effective length, it will cover the fillets, as you say, but you will have an experimental record of "what's going on" as the length diminishes.

Image

 The above is just a sketch to familiarize me with the 'scale' of the project. You're working with some really small stuff. My initial idea is to
  1. make a single petal as above; even with the very small fillets (those depicted are R 0.25 mm). They are there only to 'break' the sharp edge.
  2. drill and tap two holes in the valve plate and
  3. make a clamping bar with two screw holes and a milled slot, just allowing the petal to slide through it
 You probably have your own ideas along these lines.
Image

woody500
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 9:10 pm
Antipspambot question: 125

Re: Atom Jet with applied EVG

Post by woody500 » Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:57 am

Hi lads, this is my set up I can adjust by moving the retainer the hole is slotted one way, using a dti i can measure how much the retainer moves the valve stays in place on a shoulder bolt.
MOV00020.MP4
(1.24 MiB) Downloaded 304 times
The retainer is a pyrotainer with a clamping area diameter of 17.53 concentric with valve mounting hole.

PyroJoe
Posts: 1743
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 5:44 pm
Antipspambot question: 125
Location: Texas

Re: Atom Jet with applied EVG

Post by PyroJoe » Sat Jan 30, 2010 4:47 pm

Nice setup Phil,
Admittedly, I'm not the most proficient, but the frequency appeard to be 926 Hz for several seconds. Does anyone else pick up the same? What was the dimension from the valve tip to the retainer contact area? (if it can be measured)
Joe

WebPilot
Posts: 3716
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Antipspambot question: 0
Location: 41d 1' N 80d 22' W

Re: Atom Jet with applied EVG

Post by WebPilot » Sat Jan 30, 2010 5:15 pm


 I get 953 Hz for the fundamental. I PM'ed Phil about it last night. He said he will look into it.

Image

Image (c.t.)
Image

woody500
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 9:10 pm
Antipspambot question: 125

Re: Atom Jet with applied EVG

Post by woody500 » Sun Jan 31, 2010 9:56 am

Hi Joe, distance from tip of petal to contact area is 14.24mm I cant measure this but I know it is right from continual measuring and checking of other dimensions. Are you doing a set up as well would be good to cross reference.

woody500
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 9:10 pm
Antipspambot question: 125

Re: Atom Jet with applied EVG

Post by woody500 » Sun Jan 31, 2010 10:01 am

Here is the latest sound film with checked and re checked set up, as I said in pm Forrest I spent hours on this making sure everything was right.
MOV00023.MP4
(1.22 MiB) Downloaded 348 times
DSC00024.JPG

WebPilot
Posts: 3716
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Antipspambot question: 0
Location: 41d 1' N 80d 22' W

Re: Atom Jet with applied EVG

Post by WebPilot » Sun Jan 31, 2010 11:00 am


 Much cleaner signal, Phil, (compare it to above) but still getting too high of a fundamental. This time it's 921.9 Hz. I've PM'ed you again.

Image

Image (c.t.)
Image

PyroJoe
Posts: 1743
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 5:44 pm
Antipspambot question: 125
Location: Texas

Re: Atom Jet with applied EVG

Post by PyroJoe » Sun Jan 31, 2010 3:21 pm

Phil and Forrest,
Still working on my rig, there may be a way to attach the retainer to a cross slide from a lathe, and hard mount the valve material. This would allow a calibrated advance, also using a dial indicator against the retainer (as Phil did) as a second reference.

If this would work, then the frequency shift could be recorded along with the dial of the slide and the dial indicator. The retainer would have to be loaded against the valve in some manner.
Joe

woody500
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 9:10 pm
Antipspambot question: 125

Re: Atom Jet with applied EVG

Post by woody500 » Mon Feb 01, 2010 8:25 am

Hi everyone, here is the latest recording you asked for Forrest, its one petal with no hole underneath it and the two other petals closest are taped down so as to not interfere, this was the best one out of loads.Also included is the two other sounds you asked for.
MOV00029.MP4
(1.11 MiB) Downloaded 295 times
MOV00032.MP4
(1.27 MiB) Downloaded 294 times
MOV00033.MP4
(1.28 MiB) Downloaded 321 times

woody500
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 9:10 pm
Antipspambot question: 125

Re: Atom Jet with applied EVG

Post by woody500 » Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:09 am

Hi Joe, nice idea about using a lathe, difficult to set up though good luck hope you sort it.

PyroJoe
Posts: 1743
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 5:44 pm
Antipspambot question: 125
Location: Texas

Re: Atom Jet with applied EVG

Post by PyroJoe » Mon Feb 01, 2010 2:10 pm

Ha,
Ingenious, looks like you fellas are a step ahead. :wink:
Joe

Viv
Posts: 2158
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2003 2:35 pm
Antipspambot question: 125
Location: Normandy, France, Wales, Europe
Contact:

Re: Atom Jet with applied EVG

Post by Viv » Mon Feb 01, 2010 3:21 pm

Very impressive work guys and very interesting

Viv
"Sometimes the lies you tell are less frightening than the loneliness you might feel if you stopped telling them" Brock Clarke

Viv's blog

Monsieur le commentaire

WebPilot
Posts: 3716
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Antipspambot question: 0
Location: 41d 1' N 80d 22' W

Re: Atom Jet with applied EVG

Post by WebPilot » Mon Feb 01, 2010 4:24 pm

Phil,

Thanks for all of this. You now need to measure your recording system's (in this case, camera) ability to faithfully reproduce the desired frequency range. That's why I asked you earlier if you had any audio equipment. PM me sometime today.
Image

Post Reply