Sure.Sam wrote: Care to reveal a little more about your code? What numerical scheme are you using? What
boundary conditions are you including? (open and closed ends by the sounds of it). I assume
its 1D - Does it allow for non-uniform cross-sections?
Hmmm. I asked the same question of you, here, but received no answer. No matter, there
are many ways to solve these partial DiffEQ's. I am sure you are well aware of this
fact.
Yes, open and closed BC's exist.
ODUsF stands for One Dimensional Unsteady Flow.
'Variable cross section' is allowed.
I can appreciate that. I've written other 'sticky' codes for structural analyses (static andSam wrote: I've got a fair bit of experience in CFD codes and I think at times it can be one of the most
frustrating things I've ever undertaken. Feeling the pain yet?
vibration) and non-linear vibratory and there is no better 'rush' than when they 'work' as they
should. They always do what I tell them to do, they just don't always do what I 'want' them
to do ! ha ha
I don't feel pain anymore. I just develop a higher level of patience, perseverance
and diligence - which, I believe, a lot of the people up here, have in common.
When I get 'burnt out' working on it, I just 'walk away' from it and come
back at a later time.
The code that was most 'unforgiving' was the system dynamical one I
wrote for a pulse combustor. ODUsF wasn't (isn't) easy, either, but I
haven't developed 'dark circles' under my eyes from it (yet) .
Laters,
-fde
PS Why do my 'personal messages' to you go undelivered ?