Oh and by the way. I will post pictures tommorow as well.
Peace
Mikhail Jones
Search found 261 matches
- Fri Dec 16, 2005 6:16 am
- Forum: Valveless pulsejet forum
- Topic: Nanosoft: New Chinese Project
- Replies: 54
- Views: 47634
- Fri Dec 16, 2005 6:12 am
- Forum: Valveless pulsejet forum
- Topic: Nanosoft: New Chinese Project
- Replies: 54
- Views: 47634
re: Nanosoft: New Chinese Project
Well, I just got back from my Choir Concert (Went great!) and here is the update. I cut it close but made it. I finished making all the mods which took me just over 2 hours. The engine looks pretty good, not quite as clean and polished as before but good. I didn't have time to start or test it yet. ...
- Thu Dec 15, 2005 10:09 pm
- Forum: Valveless pulsejet forum
- Topic: Nanosoft: New Chinese Project
- Replies: 54
- Views: 47634
re: Nanosoft: New Chinese Project
I've got my work cut out for me. It's 2:00 now and at 6:00 I have a choir concert. Tomorrow I go up to Portland right after school to spend the night there before going to the airport on Saturday. So I will try my hardest to finish and run the engine today. Thanks milisavljevic.
Mikhail Jones
Mikhail Jones
- Wed Dec 14, 2005 6:06 pm
- Forum: Valveless pulsejet forum
- Topic: Nanosoft: New Chinese Project
- Replies: 54
- Views: 47634
re: Nanosoft: New Chinese Project
Sorry for the delay(Went to bed early to catch up on sleep and my account became inactive so I couldn't log on). The intakes are flared out to 31mm right now.
Mikhail Jones
Mikhail Jones
- Wed Dec 14, 2005 4:37 am
- Forum: Valveless pulsejet forum
- Topic: Nanosoft: New Chinese Project
- Replies: 54
- Views: 47634
re: Nanosoft: New Chinese Project
milisavljevic , I just wanted to say that I can't explain to you how thankful I am for all of the help you are giving me with this project. I did not intentionally try and add any aspects of the Kentfield design into mine but when I compare mine and the SNECMA Kentfield proportions I can see some ve...
- Mon Dec 12, 2005 6:03 pm
- Forum: Valveless pulsejet forum
- Topic: Nanosoft: New Chinese Project
- Replies: 54
- Views: 47634
re: Nanosoft: New Chinese Project
Thanks for all the information milisavljevic. It’s a lot to take in but I think I got it. As for were I was and am going now with this project. My goal was to achieve a relatively high thrust engine while not worrying too much about SFC. Although it does matter I don't care too much about SFC at t...
- Mon Dec 12, 2005 3:11 am
- Forum: Valveless pulsejet forum
- Topic: Nanosoft: New Chinese Project
- Replies: 54
- Views: 47634
re: Nanosoft: New Chinese Project
I took great care in making all pieces according to my plans, so the length from sparkplug to exit of tail pipe is .8 meters + or - a mm. It looks to be right at .8 Meters though
Mikhail Jones
Mikhail Jones
- Sun Dec 11, 2005 8:55 pm
- Forum: Valveless pulsejet forum
- Topic: Nanosoft: New Chinese Project
- Replies: 54
- Views: 47634
re: Nanosoft: New Chinese Project
So here is the update: I played with the lengths of the intakes and tried sticking things as Ben suggested and I tried sticking solid pipes in the exhaust to get the same effect. What I have come up with so far is better but not running right. The best configuration I tried was just blocking one of ...
- Sun Dec 11, 2005 8:40 pm
- Forum: Valveless pulsejet forum
- Topic: Nanosoft: New Chinese Project
- Replies: 54
- Views: 47634
re: Nanosoft: New Chinese Project
Wow! Apparently I am as blind as a bat. Yes its supposed to say .08485. Here are the updated plans. Sorry about that.
Nanosoft
Nanosoft
- Sun Dec 11, 2005 6:16 pm
- Forum: Valveless pulsejet forum
- Topic: Nanosoft: New Chinese Project
- Replies: 54
- Views: 47634
re: Nanosoft: New Chinese Project
Wow! Thanks for all the replies everyone, this is why I like this forum so much. So today I will try to get some testing in. First I will try Ben's idea with the tailpipe and then tinker with the intakes. I don't have much time today so that probably all I will get done. I have college apps to do. m...
- Sun Dec 11, 2005 12:54 am
- Forum: Valveless pulsejet forum
- Topic: Nanosoft: New Chinese Project
- Replies: 54
- Views: 47634
Nanosoft: New Chinese Project
Well here is my latest creation. It is a dual intake Chinese style engine. I built the entire thing in one day. As always, all pieces are formed by hand, hammer, and anvil. All pieces were MIG welded and hand sanded and polished. I designed it using my own program and then UFlow to check. But appare...
- Wed Dec 07, 2005 5:59 pm
- Forum: Valveless pulsejet forum
- Topic: Tutorials
- Replies: 11
- Views: 12043
re: Tutorials
I would like to say that I appreciate what you are doing Red_Armor. I love to expand my knowledge of how thing s work and many of the documents you have posted are very interesting and informative and I would like to thank you for posting them. Trunk_Monkey, I don't want to start something but pleas...
- Sat Nov 19, 2005 2:28 am
- Forum: Valveless pulsejet forum
- Topic: Hey Nanosoft--what's new in your PJ world??
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4492
re: Hey Nanosoft--what's new in your PJ world??
LOL. Yes, I like it, Flaming Farm. Well i am all about planning ahead so perhaps we should get the email lists back up and start considering a date and place. I don't consider myself to be running full bore for the simple fact that i have yet to finish one of those project.
Mikhail Jones
Mikhail Jones
- Fri Nov 18, 2005 4:01 am
- Forum: Valveless pulsejet forum
- Topic: Hey Nanosoft--what's new in your PJ world??
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4492
re: Hey Nanosoft--what's new in your PJ world??
Thanks for your concern Bill. I am doing just fine. I have had very little time to do anything pulsejet related since summer. During weekdays my time is spent at school, running, working out, doing homework and spending time with friends. On weekends I spend my time riding motorcycle with my dad mai...
- Tue Jun 28, 2005 3:59 pm
- Forum: Gas turbine forum
- Topic: Afterburner for FD3?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 9284
re: Afterburner for FD3?
I have never heard of it being done. But i am sure it is possible but if you want to put this on a model aircraft it may not be a good idea because it will add more wieght to the jet plus it will consum a enourmus amount of fuel so your flight will be very limited unless you add more fuel witch adds...