are you talking about keeping the torch attachment or removing that all together and hooking the propane directly up to the injector tube?metiz wrote:Try something like this. Bend your injector tube back 180 degrees so you can tie it to the intake with some hose clamps.
Search found 4 matches
- Wed May 25, 2016 12:23 am
- Forum: Valveless pulsejet forum
- Topic: would this be considered a low frequency rudimentary pulse?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 10027
Re: would this be considered a low frequency rudimentary pul
- Tue May 24, 2016 4:17 pm
- Forum: Valveless pulsejet forum
- Topic: would this be considered a low frequency rudimentary pulse?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 10027
Re: would this be considered a low frequency rudimentary pul
Do you guys have a guide to plumbing propane into a pulse jet. I have never tried my hand at that and not sure where to start exactlytufty wrote:Oh, it's yours?
In that case, you're not feeding it nearly enough. No regulator, lose the hole in the CC, shove a rosscojector up the intake.
- Tue May 17, 2016 3:50 pm
- Forum: Valveless pulsejet forum
- Topic: would this be considered a low frequency rudimentary pulse?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 10027
Re: would this be considered a low frequency rudimentary pul
huh I was just using trial and error. I can make and then share plans if anyone wants me totufty wrote:That's a "pipewood", a Lockwood-Hiller "ish" jet made from off-the-shelf plumbing parts. Invented by our very own Mike Everman, if memory serves. Search here for plans.
- Tue May 17, 2016 1:18 am
- Forum: Valveless pulsejet forum
- Topic: would this be considered a low frequency rudimentary pulse?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 10027
would this be considered a low frequency rudimentary pulse?
I am kind of new to pulse jets. So i am curious if this is considered a pulse jet.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IYMbEeRfbg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IYMbEeRfbg