www.pulse-jets.com

Yes your location shows up as Stuttgart

I cannot help you there my friend; I still do not remember the formula for cone volume alone; let alone a cone with a sliced top.

I'm from the US; Boston, Massachusetts whereabouts to be specific.

I can't help but notice you're from the parts where one of my favorite, and arguably some of the best cars of all time are made

RC Man, I have never so much as seen a pulse jet in person; I have however spent numerous hours researching all I can find on both valved and valveless of all designs.

While a simple venturi would imaginably increase velocity, I'm thinking that the baffle may create some cool toroidal vortices.

This is an incredible guide! With just the desired intake diameter I was able to in five minutes calculate all other values without having to half-assedly scale a random design. I have a question that may seem odd as it is counterintuitive. The intake diameter I require is 2"; dividing by 0.88 for a...

Also, the 50mm primary intake diameter is of some importance to me; which is why I scaled the design I found with originally 100mm intake.

[metiz], Thanks for your reply and nice to make your acquaintance; I have looked through your impressive current M500 build with a fascinated regard for your work. About the M2O, I don't have a great answer for that; I guess I've never been quite as fond of the 'focused wave style' or 'forced anti-n...

Anyone? Any advice is greatly appreciated before I invest in having parts made.

Hi all, I'm still fairly new to the forums yet a long time pulsejet enthusiast, and attempting my first build. I pretty much scaled a Lockwood Hiller Design I found online in half and made the intake 100mm longer. Does this look like it would operate as designed?

Very cool, thank you for the illustration.

It becomes pretty apparent that the tangential port(s) would almost certainly be a preferred exhaust path, and the axial exhaust would probably rather be an inlet as well.

Hi [PyroJoe], Thank you for taking the time to look at this and for commenting! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQQZkGFKTtU <This is a good practical view of air/dust flow through one of these. The flow is similar without the helical baffle this one has; though it does appear to diffuse the flow nice...

Anyone? Any thoughts or criticisms?

Hi all, This is an idea I've been mentally toying with for quite some time; spawned from my experimenting with cyclonic separators with air/water for my job. For those who are not familiar with 'cyclonic separators', or 'cyclonic dust separators' as they are sometimes referred to: http://www.simeric...